Providing credit terms isn’t a pecuniary interest.what evidence do you have that Sigma continues to fund them? I’m assuming you mean the extraordinary extended credit they initially received? I’ve been told this has been wound back to standard pharmacy industry terms that all pharmacies receive?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SIG Chart
Providing credit terms isn’t a pecuniary interest.what evidence...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SIG (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$2.78 |
Change
0.080(2.96%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.300B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$2.74 | $2.93 | $2.74 | $37.80M | 13.25M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 167207 | $2.77 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$2.79 | 246261 | 9 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
14 | 218946 | 0.530 |
12 | 254849 | 0.525 |
22 | 667773 | 0.520 |
12 | 214898 | 0.515 |
31 | 592381 | 0.510 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.535 | 238324 | 12 |
0.540 | 239570 | 11 |
0.545 | 263300 | 10 |
0.550 | 155978 | 9 |
0.555 | 81292 | 5 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 28/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
SIG (ASX) Chart |