Thanks for that
@ammie. I did not notice that it was the previous thread when I replied to Bosco.
On another note, I can see there is a tip with a 'big chunk' of text ('noise', as far as the codes are concerned) leading the standard tip heading. Now, that is beyond my codes' threshold to pick a tip. As this sort of tip submissions can appear every now and then, I thought to share a solution now.
To explain the issue, before I suggest the solution, this is the problem I have.
Say, one submits a tip starting with:
"ashjkdf dsdsasds dfsdfds sdf sdfsdfsd
sdfdsf sdfdsf sdfdsf sdf
[Standard Heading]"
If a forum member (mostly, a regular) responds to another erroneous tip, which does not have the standard heading at all (with the intention of providing helpful advice), :
"@dwqndhg, Could you please submit the tip with the correct heading so that our program can automatically pick your tip up
Correct heading for your tip is [Standard Heading]"
Now the problem is how to distinguish the tip and the advice.
To resolve this, can I suggest this. When someone posts an advice asking to correct a tip heading, can we refrain from providing a full sample heading?
It would be easier to 'control this risk' through the regulars than the relatively large number of tipsters, I guess.
If nobody finds any issue with this suggestion, I can change the codes this weekend to pick the posts with larger amount of leading random text, and we go from there.
Cheers, CC
(20min delay)
