Thanks for that @ammie. I did not notice that it was the...

Thanks for that @ammie. I did not notice that it was the previous thread when I replied to Bosco.

On another note, I can see there is a tip with a 'big chunk' of text ('noise', as far as the codes are concerned) leading the standard tip heading.  Now, that is beyond my codes' threshold to pick a tip. As this sort of tip submissions can appear every now and then, I thought to share a solution now. 

To explain the issue, before I suggest the solution, this is the problem I have.

Say, one submits a tip starting with:
"ashjkdf dsdsasds dfsdfds sdf sdfsdfsd
sdfdsf sdfdsf sdfdsf sdf 
[Standard Heading]"

If a forum member (mostly, a regular) responds to another erroneous tip, which does not have the standard heading at all (with the intention of providing helpful advice), :
"@dwqndhg, Could you please submit the tip with the correct heading so that our program can automatically pick your tip up 
Correct heading for your tip is [Standard Heading]"

Now the problem is how to distinguish the tip and the advice.

To resolve this, can I suggest this. When someone posts an advice asking to correct a tip heading, can we refrain from providing a full sample heading?
It would be easier to 'control this risk' through the regulars than the relatively large number of tipsters, I guess.  

If nobody finds any issue with this suggestion, I can change the codes this weekend to pick the posts with larger amount of leading random text, and we go from there. 

Cheers, CC