The points I raise are to balance the discussion. To ask the difficult questions and encourage discussion of them or at the very least consideration of them in looking at risk. Outsiders will read the threads and think: they really want to shut this person with doubts down. Why?
Too many times discussion veers off into wishful thinking. That inclusion gets very repetitious but few seem to mind that variety!
You say that the things I raise have already been considered, but in reality they haven't. And you know it. Otherwise people would engage on the issues instead of making it personal.
