Geoff was in his valuable NonExec Directors supporting role...

Geoff was in his valuable NonExec Directors supporting role -well in the background.

Yes, that's precisely where he belongs. Doing the least amount of damage possible.

Nobody argues that GC should be in the Executive Director role. WHY?

Because clearly he presided over a series of debacles particularly in the days around 2011 where he was basically an over enthusiastic salesman and spender, which no real strategic plan and little risk management.

Anyone with any objectivity would understand that.

That's why the market is staying well away. From the effects of these decisions.  It's got nothing to do with my posts. The evidence is there. Writ large.

Yet GC has taken yet to no responsibility publicly or privately for the effect of his decisions as far as I can tell.  It's always someone else's fault.