Originally posted by Brickwalls
So just more wrong DV, just to correct another Calamity Jane as per the other thread.
Reality - JH was a Ferghana Consultant or as the
Finger Bros say as a "
Strategic Transaction Advisor, Diagnostics/Tools Sector, to augment the firm's scientific expertise."
Link :
https://www.ferghanapartners.com/staff-member/john-hurrell/ , and that this was never directly disclosed to the Market by JH -
that's a fact. Its also common knowledge and on the record, that JH tried to pull a swifty at the AGM with a hands up vote in the face of an overwhelming resolution ballot return. Yes it's technically in the rules, but likewise it's hard to see that as "
good governance" as well.
So to be sure - JH was a
Strategic Transaction Advisor. Its there in black and white on their site.:.
Sure as I said I've seen EGM/AGM hands up before - and as it happens all by spivy and desperate Executives - all in the face of TO or ousting - just another indicator of character - Actions speak IMHO.
As for paranoia - remember that conspiracy clanger you fabricated on what was just a simple change in Auditor more suited to Anteo's current situation (ie: when Intenational expertise wad no longer needed) & where you even claimed KPMG was the auditor. Crikey you get do mixed up sometimes DV.
I have a pretty good memory and as it happens reality perception DV, and will correct your BS as I see fit - and DV as often as it takes. If you actually think your MWS scribe on HC will upset Trading on ADO (as you admitted is your motive(Post #:
35802749)) - then just watch the R e a l W o r l d keep trucking.
You really are obsessed. Yet you cannot seem to understand organisational titles and priorities.
AS PART of the Strategic Transactions which is
part of what Ferghana Partners does, he was ADVISING ON THE SCIENCE.
How this persistently escapes you is astonishing. It's bizarre. The insults are inversely related to your lack of understanding. Yet you triumphantly wheel out your link, twice! As if it's conclusive of your argument. It's the reverse.
You make the claim, which is inherently defamatory because it's saying that Hurrell wasn't acting in the best interests of ADO.
You can be part of a M&A mob and financiers, and ONLY be advising on the science. Which he was. You ascribe a function that is not there. You can be called a transaction advisor and only be advising on the science. Because this is the reality. It's what the job was.
People do love having someone to blame. And the easiest explanation is so tempting. You give the easy explanation, and ignore the much more complex reality, of the financial state that ADO was in when it sought financing from the Canadians.
You ignore the financial world reality that a deal doesn't fall over at the late stage, which is the due diligence stage, unless something has emerged out of the blue.Suddenly the Canadians wanted much different terms. It is a sign that ADO was in a much worse situation than was being presented.
Cummings and Martin had loads of time to finance their diagnostic plans. The fact is none of it stuck NONE. Something has gone deeply wrong with the strategic planning a long time ago, and with it, some diligence issues. This is commonsense and not conspiracy thinking.
The fact that you need to insult me personally - and so often...how long is it since you made a civil post to me? - shows how much you doubt the strength of your arguments. Also you posted about my motive, with no understanding whatsoever. I posted on your view of it. I don't want to keep the SP down, not when I hold! In fact many is the time that people have said that posts in here don't affect the SP!
BUT there's a need for a range of views in here. Which is why I stay. On principle. The rest of it is fascinating to me.
And as I keep saying, and you keep ignoring, I am positive about some aspects of ADO. Including the science. Always have been.
BTW well done West Coast Eagles!
(20min delay)
