Let's get something straight here.
A poster that is apt to mock holders of SGH, and provocatively state that most didn't know anything about the business, first posted about SGH on 10th December 2015. The SP was around 85c at that time after a dramatic plunge from $7 in less than 12 months. In that same post, the said poster copied the widely used quote about SGH, readily available using a google search, dissipated by a short seller.
The same poster had already posted over 2000 posts on HC so it is not a situation of new to the HC forum. So we have a poster claiming now to have known it was a fraud all along and being the saint (but no one listened to me!) warning people of SGH pitfalls not posting until the company had withdrawn guidance on the back of a greater than 80% fall in share price.
Now I smell a malicious character here. Not a rationale investing brain but one jumping on a bandwagon and claiming, I knew it was obvious. Easy to make the call after the horse has bolted. Where was this character when there were a few alarm bells ringing at $5. We did have a genuine poster raising the contrarian view and that was Grant62 - he had the guts and research to back up his doubts when the SP was at lofty heights.
To top it off, the poster has said, 'it was obviously a fraud'. Mr google actually sat on the fence with that first post (Dec 2015, SP approx. 85c) leaving the door open for a possible recovery. Here is the quote
"I hope people haven't lost too much and can learn from this. It will be soon enough to buy after the writedowns, capital raising and the company has a proven track record of profitability and cash flows."
So, after posting over 2000 times, and according to todays posts always knowing it was a fraud, suggested it will be soon enough to buy back in 2015.
Just putting it out there as a caution against reading too much into those proclaiming wisdom that is little more than 'with hindsight'.