I agree generally. But any person who brings up conversation on...

I agree generally. But any person who brings up conversation on NAIF, which has been sensible opinion based commentary also has been ripped down by AP for no reason other than it doesnt alIign to his/her view, or Isnt as 'educated' which has no merit. So, purely saying it how it is. The NAIF discussion has evolved. People who what to talk about it should and I welcome their opinions where they see points that might be relevant. The simple facts are the company are clearly talking with them, the NAIF mandate has loosened to allow investment in non infrastructure projects, and while the components of the project they direct the investment to may still be for sections like power, roads etc (in the case of the mineral sands asset), there is still a significant component ex building the ponds that will be highly likely to fall under NAIFs investment capability. So happy for him/her to provide reasonable opinion, not to cut those down who also have merit in what they are seeing/reading/finding. I want to hear everyone's views.