No, that's not what I'm saying.
If the 3.09g/t Au result is simply the average of the 7 x 0.28m samples taken (which is not 100% clear), then the sampled interval (as a composite) is 1.96m. Their intersection is therefore 1.96m @ 3.09g/t. They did not continuously sample 28.5m, and therefore gain an interval of 28.5m @ 3.09g/t, as a glance at the table suggests. Can you imagine if 0.3m of a drill hole was sampled every 5m then the results extrapolated to full length intersections?
That's it from me anyway folks - good luck.
No, that's not what I'm saying. If the 3.09g/t Au result is...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
