"[59] That said, I do not consider that the proposed orders...

"[59] That said, I do not consider that the proposed orders should be made in the form proposed by the applicant."

"[61] Further, in my view, the issues to be considered by the Commission, presently as put by the applicant, do not require the breadth and generality of the items in Categories 1 to 5 at this time. I also consider that the documents sought over the period of 1 January 2012 and 1 January 2013 in respect to Categories 1 to 4 and the period 1 June 2016 to 23 August 2018 for Category 5, to be an onerous and unnecessary burden on Woolworths"

-Deputy President

Source: https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/html/2018fwc6361.htm

Chances are that Woolworths have the documents archived anyway.I think this case has no legs, but it won't stop the union and ABC from drumming up anger towards Woolworths.Seems that many people out there don't know about EBAs (even though they might well be employed under one), so when they hear "The agreement pays no penalty rates on weeknight evenings, during the day on Saturday and cuts the Sunday penalty rate" they get outraged.