Share
1,643 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 131
clock Created with Sketch. 17/03/19
10:11
Share
Originally posted by ericson:
↑
I am sure the board monitor and are happy with the services delivered by all contracted parties otherwise they would act accordingly. I don’t believe it necessary for the board to confirm or publish ongoing proof of this being the case. If investors feel certain consultants aren’t delivering then they are free to write to the company and voice their concern . The only thing I would say is that certain consultancies don’t have intermediate publicly disclosable milestones due to the very nature of the consultancy : the judgement has to made by the board who contracted them. I am confident that our board are happy with all contracted services and would act appropriately as soon as they felt a service was failing in terms of value or likelihood of achieving ultimate delivery.
Expand
I agree to a certain extent, however even a paragraph to cover the services of AG in the summary review announcements should be no biggy for AVZ and it would give the SHs some reassurance that our money is being spent wisely.
