what doesn’t make sense is why they need $34m and another $6m that we are likely to add to our cash this 1H? And there are possible hints on the takeovers. Why not return the cash to the holders when the future growth is fully funded from the current and future cash flows.
Not sure why? But feels like either div or buy back on the scope.
what doesn’t make sense is why they need $34m and another $6m...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
