Replacement Board of Directors, page-86

You will get something right sooner or later though.....
Taking all day? I wouldn't think so, I can speed type and even use correct gramma while I am doing it.

I did say I would assist supporting it, if that was the direction @Pinkie38 wants to take after the AGM, and as for the numbers you may be surprised I also fail to see why the onus will be on me for the consequences because ultimately every shareholder would have a chance to vote. A 249D issued to remove/replace a board member if defeated wouldn't necessarily mean the share price would tank, I would think that it would show the market the shareholders were happy with current management and voted to keep them, YES?NO?
But according to you, that deemed this was dead in the water from day 1, then on that assumption the share price is going to tank anyway, is it not?

You are confusing at times though, on one hand you say it isn't the right thing to do, but on the other hand....
"I would love to see new blood in the camp, some young go getters, someone with experience in mining and definitely get rid of the old buddies that are the current set of directors, I dont believe the management will really care that much about the attempted spill, they are quite arrogant IMO"
With an arrogant management, a management that doesn't care how would you propose we could get the young go getters in? Just asking .........

Nothing irked you when you continually ramped the stock and tried to shut down posters that had concerns with GPP and the management, but change your sentiment because "oh my goodness" they actually had valid points and you want to be an all caring saviour to the long suffering shareholders while predicting the share price to fall to $0.005c or even lower, hmmm.

cheers