Ok, it is obvious you don’t read. I haven’t proposed any actions...

Ok, it is obvious you don’t read.
I haven’t proposed any actions to warrant me considering any consequences, all I actually did was reply to a post from @parker11 who asked “How would you get rid of current management if you could.”
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/an...4171378/page-57?post_id=32920744#.WvRC7dOuxm8
IN the same (above} post, it was in my opinion that taking that avenue (s249D) wasn’t the right course of action to take and that management will be given a loud and clear message when it comes time to vote on the resolutions.
In a subsequent post # 32966488 I again indicated that I didn’t think it would be the best course of action at this present time, I also said that although I was flattered to be mentioned to be a board member, I didn’t want it and I didn’t have required skill sets to be able to do it!
EGO ????? As @nondiscrypt eloquently responded in this post # 32997448 neither myself or @anatol showed any characteristics of ego but rather both made comments that were quite contrary to what your suggesting. Ego would be best adorned and more suited to someone that hands themselves gold stars one would think………

Thanks for the reminder of when I was pro GPP management, your post # 32997172 (10/5/18) I hate to burst your bubble but I have made no secret that I was pro management at one point in time, and I mentioned it in a post as recently as Sunday 6^th May 2018
dated 6/5/18 with added links to additional post re: change of sentiment and rebutting contrarian views> "Yes, attitude to management did change for all the reasons I have previously posted, and yes I was even pro GPP at some point as well, to the point that I had on the rose coloured glasses and questioned everyone that challenged GPP and management...... (sic)
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/an...4171378/page-42?post_id=32914825#.WvOxCtOuxm8

Just a point of correction with your referencing of me making a comparison between GPP and PLS post # 32998018
The only comparison was with GPP’s share price at the time and PLS’s early share price profile being similar
View attachment 473831 with an acknowledgment to the person providing the charts post # 22807580
Another point of correction, it never took my hours to go over any of your posts considering that you only posted on the 9^th May (2 days ago) that GPP was a spec stock and doomed to failure from day 1. #32980105

You do continually contradict yourself:
Tuts, I think your correct, the best two for the job would be a toss up between anatol and Fooca,…… post #32953144 8/5 and just 2 days later
I dont think either of the names put forward would be suitable to be honest….. post #32998018 10/5

I am also glad you brought up @Ted1950 considering you didn’t answer his query, re post # 28203357
but chose to just tell him to wake up and look around. It is quite bemusing that you had no qualms, concerns or considerations about other shareholders when you and others continually ramped the share for a prolonged period of time and now feel the need to take the moral ground for shareholders that may have brought high and currently deep in the red without any thoughts it may have been due to the hype you contributed to (re: 10 bags in 6 months, 2.9c at time you posted that)
As you brought into GPP for the Lithium, and after ramping how good Morabisi was going to be and how you had been blown away with the 90 metre width you sold before the first drill had been placed. So after a year of trying to rebut HC commentators posts in regards to management you have finally seen problems within and now complain and make comment on management, which is fine because they deserve it, but you have taken it to another level whereas you now don’t think the “3 bazookas” (or was it 4) will come of anything and are wild guessing the company will abandon all these and go after Cobalt at Kopang post#32901037

All IMO only
cheers