You're a joker ... didn't answer my question about how either of...

You're a joker ... didn't answer my question about how either of them are about ego - neither nominated themselves but that's OK we'll move along.

Of the 2 names (there were actually 3) I think no one can fault Anatol's research and passion for GPP since early days. And yes, I agree he's highly excitable about what he sees as huge prospects in Guyana ... I believe he's genuine in his belief and his desire for ALL SHAREHOLDERS to see progression.

Fooca has already said why he wouldn't be worthy and isn't interested but he too has been also highly excitable about the shortcomings of management because of his desire for ALL SHAREHOLDERS to see progression.

The hypocrisy in your statement "they are not just playing with their money but many other SH's, they need to remember that" astounds me. Have you had a brain fart about how pro management you were in the past and that you'd ridicule anyone who questioned whether this resource was going to be bigger than Ben-Hur?

So here's another question for you to avoid, do you feel any responsibility for the shareholders that are, as you say, "heavily involved" ALREADY and have lost "a fair bit" ALREADY because they may have listened to your running commentary for over 12 months? Or does your ego not allow you to see the comparison?