I can't understand the logic in that?
they lodged a notice on the 12th that they ceased to be a substantial holder ie they are not anymore. If they crossed them then it would just have been a change notice with different legal entities named.
The only logical conclusion is that they sold in a placement deal but to multiple holders that are individually under 5%.
are you basing your thinking on something discussed with the company or another source or just you interpretation of the announcement?
I can't understand the logic in that? they lodged a notice on...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
