sure the user pays, but with the recent negative budget changes...

sure the user pays, but with the recent negative budget changes to medical insurance affordability and medicare rebate for cataract surgery, a lot more people are going to be unable to afford private cataract surgery and will turn to the public sector or else defer the surgery until a later date thus affecting company revenue negatively

also because the medicare rebate is going to be leess for cataract surgery, private health insurance companies will reimburse less - this will further reduce profits

the medicare ruling came AFTER the takeover talks started so surely this must have a negative effect on the take over offer price (if it ever happens which seems unlikely)and also make the company a lot less attractive to take over - and this is even before considering whether the doctors in the company would agree to a takeover at a price much much lower than the price when they signed up

is there anything wrong with this line of reasoning?