IMO, if you have something of value, you look to realise that...

IMO, if you have something of value, you look to realise that value - either by keeping it, growing it or selling it. If you dissolve "the thing of value", it probably wasn't worth anything to anyone.

Does that mean they were misleading shareholders? It's not my first assumption. Go Getta probably did have small margins. Those margins also look like they were incredibly difficult to achieve. And remember, just because you can do something doesn't mean you should. So any potential buyer would look at the proposition and ask "Could I get the same or better margins elsewhere with less difficulty/risk?" And I dare say, since SIV themselves had decided that they could, then most others would be of the same opinion. So no sale.