Yes @BenC - I agree. I am not sure why that information is not...

Yes @BenC - I agree. I am not sure why that information is not consistent across the differing sources?

It is difficult to understand the recent criticism about my research skills with respect to the T20. Similar comments have been made on previous occasions. For example - see post 37031737.

Anyway, let's examine my earlier posts on the TV2U T20 to verify the standard of research.

Here are the posts that I made re the T20 lists (37160045 ) & (37168407)

What is particularly frustrating in responding to this kind of wafer thin rebuttal, is that the complainant(s) rarely offer up their own quantitative data for scrutiny by the forum. They seem to just take exceptional delight in ridiculing the work of others.

Fact 1 - I refer to the table I posted at the top of the page of this post (37160045). For ease of reference it is the September 2018 table. There you will find Talico listed for 303,571,428 shares.

Fact 2 - I also included a link in that post to an additional source that also notes Talico's holdings in TV2U. Here it is again for all to read.
https://www.marketindex.com.au/asx/tv2 

Fact 3 - I used the 2017 chart to highlight / contrast the incongruities between the different T20 lists.

I wonder if there is something about TV2U that some posters know that the rest of us do not?

I ask the question because I keep posting verifiable facts on TV2U and one or two 'others' seem to continue to question my research. Yet they fail to offer to alternatives that would satisfactorily counter arguable points. Why?

And then, gallingly, some members proclaim to the entire forum that they were putting me on ignore and yet still offer up their critiques e.g. (37149459)?