Fly, sorry, but you are carelessly confusing different “spaces”...

Fly, sorry, but you are carelessly confusing different “spaces” here. The space that involves terrorists messaging each other under cover of encryption is light years away from the space where governments and enterprises need to take best-possible steps to protect their critical data from potential attackers and inadvertent exposure via BYOD and other technology gaps.

But even in the first case, Covata is the creator of KaaS, which neatly sidesteps the calls of the Euronations. This “Euroconcern” actually plays to KaaS’ strengths, whereby KaaS-encrypted messages could be legally found to warrant decrypting, leading to the holders of the different portions of the KaaS keys being able to fulfill their prescribed piece of the decryption process in accordance with the applicable legislation...US, Euro, UK, AUS...wherever.

What you describe as a potential disaster for CVT could well prove to be one of the instances where CVT’s global leadership in encryption shines through…to shareholders’ great advantage.

In the end, thanks for highlighting what is one of CVT’s biggest (and unique) differentiators.

(Back to hibernation, Acca)