"Peel is an explorer of quality, not a PR marketing firm, so...

"Peel is an explorer of quality, not a PR marketing firm, so whilst I do appreciate and get your point, is the alternative is to employ people just for promo’s? "

Exactly ! If the M.D is too busy with other duties ( which i imagine he is ) the alternative is to employ someone to do the job of marketing. The cost of that salary would more than likely be recouped many times over.


" I’ll bet many commentators here haven’t met or bothered to speak with Rob or his team, yet they still say odd things with inevitable inexplicable and unwarranted assumption, their only friend. "

Once more i will repeat this is a public company ! Shareholders should not have to call the M.D in order to glean what his game plan is for the company. This is information which should be released into the public domain.

"We know there’s a litany of washed up juniors out there that have sadly & unfortunately, toiled solidly and lost in every manner of opportunity.
Or does Rob manage the company, go drill, go explore, then analyse and report properly or waste his time and his/our money on interim conjecture huff n puff, and proffer all manner of insufficiently scrutinised data?."

Comparing the bottom of the barrel of this sector in order to prosecute an argument is the wrong approach. Why not compare Peel's performance to those who operate in an industry best manner. There are other explorers who can & do manage to report more regularly ( some with real time drill data ) who operate in an exacting way to achieve the best possible outcome. Guys who understand that this business is as much about marketing as it is about drilling.