question for agm, page-10

Acorn

On a re-read of your post, there isn't really a lot I can add.

"who were the shareholders that requested the original agm be postponed" >>> we weren't told who they were other than they were shareholders at the time of AGM (Mark 1).

"Obviously there is some dissatifaction with recent performances but the voting results indicates something else to me" >>> I am not sure what it tells you, but as the vote went something like 40 mill for and 30 mill against it tells me that it should be a wake up call to the Board ... hopefully.

We seem to agree that Alan Flavelle's silence on technical matters is irregular under the circumstances ... I should add that I am convinced that Lorraine gas can flow with horzontal wells and good technical decisions ... we just need high probability identified drill targets (say about 10) packaged up for a competent closely supervised drilling and testing campaign by a motivated partner imo.

"Could you comment on NFJ's resignation and the statement that EPG could " potentially be working with NFJ in the future "" >>> that last quoted statement was words or similar words to the same effect that I heard (or thought I heard lol) made by Terry Willsteed at the AGM (Mark 2) ... make of it what you will ... hopefully some effective changes are afoot.

Regards
Dex