Hmmm. Maybe my memory was faulty about it actually proceeding before a court and it was simply the provision of legal advice that reversed EMA's position about not classifying VG as a device.
Read the 29/7/2013 announcement Cro.
Rev
Q&A, page-7
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 10 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
