Perhaps because rulings in Singapore are binding on courts and...

Perhaps because rulings in Singapore are binding on courts and jurisdictions under the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under the UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (New York Convention).

My read is that any liability imposed by the SICC will likely be able to be binding over a wide jurisdiction.

Guess you hold Kangaroo...

Who knows how it will go but WEC are backed by enough self made billionaires that they wouldn't have taken on legal proceedings without a view they have a strong case. i.e. they don't work for the companies, they've built them. WEC is still backed by Flannery and AMCI - I'm happy to back Mende