It was obvious was it? Sorry I must be stupid.
It was obviously to support share price cause that is what they are used for. Gallagher was so far under water at that stage they were never going to put in and a small bounce on share buy back would have made no difference.
There is NO QUESTION the announcement was worded as a done deal with a strong inclination it was imminent. The suggestion now that it was conditional is probably sueable except they can afford very good lawyers.....lol
It was obvious was it? Sorry I must be stupid.It was obviously...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
