This is the critical mistake.
There are a large variety of products to be used with standard care, some are very cheap and some are much more expensive.
So the term of "standard of care" is very wide on a worldwide basis. It is us just vefy different, at least admit this. Moreover, the end quality of the cicatrization and the carbon based testing of the water wound sudation are part of the critical efficacy readings.
If this has been told me by a past member of the EMA would you agree more? This is the case.
But I see that you act like you know everything and especially how supervisory body works.
I see the result and the outcome. This is the problem to run trials from countries that do no
https://www.healthline.com/health/atrophic-gastritis#symptomst have the feet in actual supervisory bodies works and internal dynamics.
It is happened in Europe and in the USA again.
But seems that the interest among the parties do not match.
This is very clear.
