Power to 2050, page-18

@Brumbypat may have been referring to me? RE: "Yep. Unfortunately, any comments on the HotCopper threads that state any potential negatives are usually shot down and dismissed as fanciful."

I do find it a bit ironic that "potential negatives are usually shot down" when negative comments become incendiary:

Example "For those hardy souls who believe that business uptake of solar won't happen, I pity your future loss of capital." Post #17285401 First initial salvo?

"DYOR as always, but the battery storage boom will wipe out energy companies who do nothing to create a smart grid. Disc: Do not own EPW. Do own RFX." Post #17285401 Second salvo?

Its a two way street.

I have really enjoyed this robust debate and as any investor should be very open to it. It is greatly appreciated @leasx & @Brumbypat because it has vastly increased my knowledge base, and provided another company to research i.e RFX.

GLTAH Stay frosty.