The discount to NTA is made all the more surprising by conservative elements of the valuation, particularly the cost of equity.
IMO, there is significant refinancing potential for the underlying assets in the short to medium term and re-rating potential for the fund.
Personally, I'd prefer them to be more aggressive. At ~40% debt/EV at the asset level and no debt at fund level they could be accused of laziness rather than prudence - but I guess that is why BAA became a target?
Does anyone know the nature / terms of the pre-empts mentioned in the April presentation to the UBS transport conference?
Always DYOR.
The discount to NTA is made all the more surprising by...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add FGX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.27 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $518.3M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.27 | $1.27 | $1.25 | $823.1K | 651.8K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 75621 | $1.27 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.27 | 53000 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 26/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| FGX (ASX) Chart |
