Hi Wack
Thank you for your ongoing & valuable contributions to the DEG threads.
With regard to the Alluvial/Non Alluvial (Conglomerate) gold question & its brief mention in the earlier DEG thread (Pacton Gold up 42%), do you have an opinion regarding its relevance for our JV's with Vanmaris & FarnoMacMahon (Novo) on the nearby tenements in the Egina area.
Specifically, as per the respective option agreements the vendors (VM & FM) retain Alluvial gold rights only on these JV tenements.
Based on this I suggest that DEG should be able to claim up to 80%/75% of all other non-alluvial gold (Conglomerate & Structural) on those JV tenements.
If conglomerate gold is subsequently found on the JV tenements – & they are less than 10km from where Novo is discovering conglomerate now – it could materially improve DEG's bottom line if it was determined that conglomerate gold is not alluvial.
Welcome all opinions on this important question.
Cheers Ark
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- DEG
- Pilbara Goes for Gold.......
Pilbara Goes for Gold......., page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add DEG (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$1.40 |
Change
0.055(4.10%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.115B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$1.38 | $1.41 | $1.36 | $9.178M | 6.594M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 247 | $1.40 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$1.40 | 199327 | 9 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 98838 | 0.097 |
3 | 164295 | 0.096 |
4 | 79115 | 0.095 |
2 | 55000 | 0.093 |
1 | 100000 | 0.092 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.100 | 100000 | 1 |
0.105 | 420062 | 7 |
0.110 | 220284 | 3 |
0.115 | 140300 | 4 |
0.120 | 158460 | 8 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 15/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
DEG (ASX) Chart |