From an investors point of view BPAM is the fundamental problem with the current structure. If the share price suddenly climbs at a rate greater than the all ordinaries accumulation index, you could have the ridiculous situation where the company makes a loss for the year (they are already predicting a first half loss) yet BPAM get a performance fee over and above their normal management fee. Even if it happened when there was a profit, BPAM's performance fee would then reduce the profit making dividends to shareholders much lower.
The reason they continually push asset values is that this is how BPAM are paid for their management fee (1.2% of the portfolio value).
BPAM have made sure they are the real winners of this deal, not BFC and its shareholders.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BFC
- Performance
Performance, page-10
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BFC (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $5.991M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
BFC (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
ACW
ACTINOGEN MEDICAL LIMITED
Andy Udell, CCO
Andy Udell
CCO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online