Ummm... MarkieMills I think it's you who needs to be more precise. You've cited four different halves' EBITDAs which is only enough to state 1.5 yr EBITDA growth (or lack thereof in this case). You've made the classical fencepost error.
Woollydog had it right in the first place (assuming numbers correctly cited).
That said, zero EBITDA growth over 1.5 yrs is still not promising news.
Patersons confident, page-28
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
