So, are you claiming that the helicopters used by the...

So, are you claiming that the helicopters used by the military/police are owned by a WWI subsidiary (or WWI itself) and that they therefore are complicit in the alleged wrong doings?

There appears nothing to that effect in the article - after all the helicopters, from what I can gather, have operated for years independently of the WWI crew ferrying workers into the river to mine gold?

If it is the case that both WWI and the police/military hire the helicopter from the (third party) owners how can any wrong be attributed to WWI?

If the latter is the case, it seems rather misleading imo to drag WWI people into this?

In any event, very clear that only one side of a story is being told here....