Q: "How do you know it wasn't designed into the plant or that...

Q: "How do you know it wasn't designed into the plant or that existing plant can not handle the extra process if it only takes leaching with different acid or mixing with different solvents and refluxing to do the separation ?"
A: I don"t know if it was designed into the plant. h0rco DO you KNOW?
What I DO know from the last roadshow, is that by NTU's numbers, they still intend to be shipping a TREO carbonate mix that contains with 59% Yttrium and a 3.7% mix of Lanthanum and Cerium, which was also targeted for removal.

"Since you are so sure it was NOT designed into the plant and that it didn't work how about you share with us here the exact process used by NTU and ANSTO to remove the yttrium."
h0rc0, it might pay to re read my post and ask questions on what I had "ACTUALLY" written, instead of making false statements.

And as from the July 17 Argonaut report, which is now back up on NTU's website, taking into account the R&D rebates and also the current spot prices (July 17) they expect the pilot plants net cash-flows will be near break even.
Back in July 17 DyO was roughly 4% greater than what it is today.

IMO after three years you are left with a flogged out 55+million plant that is worth sweet fa. Then I Divide sweet fa by 868,860,000 (current shares) shares, what will the punters be left with.

Q: horco what do you think shareholders stand to gain out of a 3 year R&D pilot plant that MIGHT come be near break even?
...