And not to place too fine a point on it, but you then have DC on...

And not to place too fine a point on it, but you then have DC on the public record saying ESG are very happy with the PEL 6 corehole drilling results, and OIP management and the allegedly Independent Experts talking down the value of the licenses with comments to the effect 'it is very unlikely the tenemenants have any CSG potential'.

Again, which is it? Clearly not both. It's hard to imagine DC was stating "We're very happy PEL6 confirmed nothing". I think he's in a real bind because of the board and shareholders involved with the company.

Are they good results (as reported albeit generally by DC) or not good (as per OIP and their I/E's)?

JT