Ore Genesis thread, page-2

Following on from my original post on this thread and in particular the possibility that the Rupice prospect could form part of a Bessih-type mineralised system, analogous to SFR's DeGrussa group of deposits  in the Bryah Basin of WA, I have taken figures 7a and 7b from Franco Pirajno's (et al) paper and re-scaled them against Fig 1 of ADT's 17/7/2018 Rupice northern extension exploration announcement so that all three figures have the same scale (see below).

The top figure (7A) shows the Degrussa and Conductor 1 deposits at DeGrussa together with an outline of the Degrussa open pit.

The second figure (7B) shows the plan view of the DeGrussa mine with open pit outline, UG workings and all the separate ore zones (DeGrussa, Conductor 1, 4 and 5). It should be noted that conductors 4 and 5 were discovered after the main DeGrrussa lense, which from memory is formed by the DeGrussa mineralisation plus the conductor 1 mineralisation which is structurally offset by a fault which has thrown it deeper. I believe from memory that conductors 4 and 5 are considered separate lenses.

The third figure (1) shows the Rupice mineralisation outline (plus hole traces) against IP anomalies before hole BR 18-5.

Given the possibility of a Bessih style VMS system being the genetic model for the Rupice mineralisation and the fact that Bessih VMS deposits commonly occur in clusters, as is seen at DeGrussa (a close cluster in this case) and that the Rupice mineralisation appears to continue down plunge towards the tenement boundary (which by my estimates is only 75m away), it absolutely goes without say the ADT need to work on securing permits to the north of the current tenure, not to mention significant more landholdings around the existing tenure, especially where they have already identified IP anomalies. Esh