Re "based on the Korean test results, Korea won’t progress as a...

Re "based on the Korean test results, Korea won’t progress as a market for EdenCrete, IMHO. The Korean results showed, to me, that EdenCrete is a jack of some trades, if the matrix is compatable,  and master of none."

2 points:
Firstly, imo the Korean results didn't show anything of substance, and won't unless we learn the dosage rates, especially for the "negative" test results.

Secondly, the EDE ann included the following: "To date, highly encouraging results have been achieved in 23 out of the 29 tests completed to date (including on some tests, the same test measured after as many as three different time periods). In the compressive strength tests, one mix tested at three different time periods resulted in three of the six, mostly small negative results that have resulted to date." (my underlining)

So it's possible that the one mix tested 3 times etc was a faulty mix, giving 3 false negatives, and that the overall results are slightly better than shown on face value - results which came across as disappointing at first glance.

Not saying you are wrong, just saying that it's hard to make any judgement based on the information that we were given, and lack of detailed info is frustrating. There must be a valid reason why the ann stated "highly encouraging results".