I find it perplexing when people state it's in everyone's interest for news flow - hasn't that always been the case? And the failure by management to do so in the past has been an ongoing contentious issue. So what has changed - why this new belief in management?
Yes it's true the Li will either be there or not but holders of other spec stocks (irrespective of brand) have seen the sweet rewards that a competent management team can achieve for shareholders in a timely period. I agree with
@Tragore if it's there the sp will go up but let's not forget that there are peeps that hold at significantly higher prices in part because currently they're down to only 1 of the 3 projects that were touted as potential active money makers ... amusingly by some who now have too 're-branded' themselves in an attempt to hide from their past failures.
This positive expectation that things will change is all well and good; but the only reason that I can think that the GPP Leopard may change its spots is that it's running out of bazookas fast and shareholders are becoming increasingly sceptical about whether management do indeed have their "best interests" in the forefront of their mind and are starting to pressure them more to be answerable for their actions. Whether that is because the sooky la la brigade just want to shhhh
@fooca and others up or not doesn't matter - the reality is they are now being held to account, as they should be, whereas before it was just a delusional hype-fest.
I can't help but wonder who is managing this project GPP or GSM? ... does management actually have any control or are they just sitting on the couch each day twiddling their thumbs waiting for announcements in their inbox too, furiously hoping, like shareholders, that instead of all the past failed promises this time they might get lucky?