There was no intent re: not mentioning the 72 years of prior...

There was no intent re: not mentioning the 72 years of prior mining, apologies to all for not delving deeper, but as I have no interest in AVZ I never looked that far back when I done a quick look at announcements but points taken.
It was done only for a comparison to determine time frames albeit factors obviously favoured AVZ speed to drill but that also doesn't take away from the 2 years of the substantial amount of work undertaken by GSM to identify areas which are prospective for lithium and tantalum including compiling, interpreting and undertaking desktop work in relation to historic information.

As for getting updates, it is everyones interests and the company's obligations once material information is known to keep shareholders informed but to date that hasn't been the case though.

All the above IMO only
cheers