previous board used an asset consultant and had a normal beauty parade to choose OC who have spectacularly outperformed Naos and GB. Would like to hear more about how Naos was chosen. Naos seem to be telling shareholders how it will be done, that we will accept a higher price and a10 ,15 ?year contract. Where is our board reasoning's as to why accepting an at best median performer for us on these conditions is in shareholders interests.
previous board used an asset consultant and had a normal beauty...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NSC (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
43.0¢ |
Change
-0.005(1.15%) |
Mkt cap ! $62.71M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 43.5¢ | 43.5¢ | 42.5¢ | $81.38K | 189.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 88406 | 42.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 43.5¢ | 99322 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 22/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NSC (ASX) Chart |
