Sorry guys, you can't do the maths because you don't have the...

Sorry guys, you can't do the maths because you don't have the figures.

The cash cost is misleading. It is not total costs. I agree it should be profitable but we can't tell how much from the cash cost.

With 235m shares on issue it's not $1 a share yet.

Looking fairly good, though.

p.s. there isn't a standard definition of cash cost. But so long as the company uses the same basis all the time then it's a useful comparison, qtr/qtr.