@Nijiman I hope your dissatisfaction with the delayed results is...

@Nijiman I hope your dissatisfaction with the delayed results is warranted, i.e. spectacular visuals and XRF results have been achieved however remain unannounced pending assay verification.

I think it is possible that the drilling since field activities resumed in the new year have yielded encouraging results without being headline grabbing. I think this applies to both Southern Nights/Fenceline and Wirlong.

I hope I am proven wrong but I'm raising the possibility.

I have previously posted that the strategy at Wirlong after 10 months of no drilling is puzzling - they are not targeting extensions to the main lens (27m @ 5.3% Cu and 17m @ 4.59% Cu) but rather chasing something else "to the south of the main mineralized zone."

Regarding Southern Nights I previously posted that it appears to be a high grade lens with a thickness of 7-12 meters and a strike of 120 meters. I support the idea of all the drilling on a broad scale to find other high grade lenses (preferably with near surface proximity) but the priority should be to chase the discovered high grade lens down dip - as we know the Cobar style orebodies persist to depths of in excess of 1,000 meters.