Share
3,627 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 5
clock Created with Sketch.
21/03/16
15:09
Share
Originally posted by Autosime
↑
I do my own investing and analysis and last year I decide to expose myself to more ideas through MF, my first ever paid subscription. The news letter is very poor with new recommendations being far and few betweem. They also made some shocking calls on exiting out of dominos very early , but what annoys me the most is most of their cometary is to gain interest with no real advice or view in the end .
Is Rio a great buy
Should you by Virgin over Qantas
Is AVG a better buy than TWE
You read them and in the end they hedge their bets .
They try to flog different menberhips, the million Dolllarclub , share investor , dividend investor etc. they are not responsive to coverage of stocks. The other thing is they move a stock to sell ( on the premium service -CLH) while retaining it as a buy for an extra week on the more popular service SA . So what happens is the premium service subcribers sell and the other subscribers end up soaking up some of the supply , a very unethical process .
Now they have another offer for small cap stocks
I am fascinated to see at what price they list the CLH exit - at 1.18 , the close for the day before they released the sell recommendation or at 1.02, the price when people would have exited
It's a pretty poor service ,I don't mind the occasional bad call,but they simply don't provide enough new ideas to be a worthwhile service IMO
Expand
One of their article writers wrote about CZZ and he goes they had half yearly earnings of 40 cps so that means at $8 they aren't cheap at PER of 20. LOL, I emailed them and wrote on the guys twitter account, he deleted the comment and updated the article. Bush league though, I agree the articles just create interest, sometimes they contradict each other.