can anyone understand the double announcement of burden's purchases, they appear to be the same document to me, but just an amended title.
seems strange. not a big deal though.
would have been nice if burden had cracked out more than $2k. another purchase by other directors would be good.
can anyone understand the double announcement of burden's...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
