@KnuckleSandwich,
I see you're happy to sit in judgment and to call the researched, bona fide enthusiasm of other posters "continual pumping" of Helix. Yet I don't see any research behind your assertion - just motherhood comments about it not being a "surer thing". Now into my 51st year of stock trading, I had worked out that exploration stocks are not a "surer thing" as you call it - and I think most of us know that.
I think most also understand that
risk and reward are related - but we are prepared to have a go at an exploration story when the risk-reward balance looks right. No need to spell out that each person can assess how many they want to buy and in what circumstances they want to hold etc. This is a stock forum after all.
I confess to having a lot of HLX and being very, very enthusiastic about them - and yes, posting about them as a "Buy" - more than once - and putting in my rationale, for whatever it's worth. I find that more helpful than
emotive statements about "pumping", which
seem a little churlish.
BTW, I also confess to having bought GBR a while ago - when they were much cheaper than today as a result of the reading something written by HC poster
@1ForDaMoney, who I note to be another Helix enthusiast. Did you read about GBR's pentlandite-chalcopyrite discovery announcement today, BTW?? It's early days, and exploration at Mt Venn may not be all plain sailing but with
GBR's share price up 35% today as I write this, I'm grateful for his post. I knew GBR wasn't a "surer thing" when I bought that, either, but I thought the risk-reward was worthwhile, at the time.
Helix has some
incredibly exciting prospects, IMO - and several of them will be drill tested this year. If any of them prove up as mines - as I suspect more than one will - the "Buy" sentiment will have been more than justified. Perhaps you should
"DYOR".
