$15/t IO will never happen ("never" omitting Armageddon, etc).
This is what the iron ore cost curve looks like (that is, cumulative tonnes produced at their production costs (in this case, delivered cost (CFR) into China):
This particular one shows the actual 2013 cost curve (at rear) with the 2018 planned cost curve (front). The different colours represent different countries (Aust is in green, China in red). A couple of things to note:
- Where total production meets total demand is about where the current spot price is (these curves don't show total demand). On the current curve it sits at about $75 - $80/t. Note that most of China's production sits above this price, but there are reasons why that's allowed/sustainable.
- Excess production at the lower end or, conversely, reduced demand, will shift the curve to the right and will put the high cost producers into a loss making scenario. That is, the higher cost producers will be producing excess tonnes at a cost above the sustainable spot price. This is why Twiggy bitches about Rio and BHP expanding their production (like he hasn't!)
- Spot price cant sustainably fall below the price of inherent demand as supplied by the marginal producer. For example, if the spot price is $80/t and not enough producers can supply profitably at $80/t in spite of demand, the spot price will increase to meet that supply cost.
- A price of $15/t will see ALL producers become unprofitable. Whilst they can sustain that for a quarter or so, eventually so much supply will drop out of the market that demand will exceed supply and the price will re-adjust back upwards (that's why I refer to a "sustainable" spot price - high price volatility can, of course, produce a spot price below the cost of supply, but that situation cannot exist for long).
- For example, if the spot price fell long term to, say, $20/t, only about 100Mt of supply would wash its face, leaving the other circa 2billion tonnes of demand unfilled as those suppliers would just stop producing (eventually).
- The iron cost curve changes on an almost daily basis as, of course, does global demand.
- The marginal producer (at or near the spot price/total demand-supply equilibrium) is a price taker and must be nimble to stay in business. The likes of Atlas and the huge army of small producers that have stretched out the above curves from 2013 to 2018 dance to the tune of this cost curve.
- The producers at the left side of the curve (ie, low cost producers: Rio, BHP, Vale) can be smug in knowing that a huge tonnage must come out of production before any IOP reduction affects them.
- These curves show why, when the IOP fell below $40/t, it just HAD to go back up, as it did. The only question was: how long could the producers sustain sub $40/t before closing down and restricting supply?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MGX
- Next Mining Boom Coming
Next Mining Boom Coming, page-24
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add MGX (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
29.5¢ |
Change
-0.005(1.67%) |
Mkt cap ! $365.5M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
29.5¢ | 30.0¢ | 29.0¢ | $350.5K | 1.189M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
13 | 127764 | 29.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
30.0¢ | 302574 | 6 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 37120 | 0.920 |
3 | 45770 | 0.915 |
3 | 31253 | 0.910 |
3 | 68342 | 0.905 |
2 | 44392 | 0.900 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.925 | 15328 | 2 |
0.930 | 89494 | 6 |
0.935 | 70442 | 3 |
0.940 | 72592 | 7 |
0.945 | 128342 | 5 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 26/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
MGX (ASX) Chart |