Any t/o by the major shareholders would automatically disqualify them in the vote to approve it. So, which shareholders would vote in favour of a t/o that is below cash backing, let alone below cash backing + franking credits, and below the typical 30%-odd premium for control? I suspect very few to none.
Money is cheap right now, so paying any premium for the cash holding is illogical. Any t/o would logically include a large franking credit-backed special divvy - and since that divvy will paid to the shareholder taking over the company as well, their total cost for the t/o would be commensurably smaller.
Having said that, I do not see any reason for a t/o unless there is something on the horizon that will significantly bolster value. There are very few projects on the market that promise blue sky at a reasonable price. This may suggest they should be looking off market - ie, at projects that the majors are thinking of exiting.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- News: MGX Mount Gibson Iron announces 2016/17 financial year forecast
Any t/o by the major shareholders would automatically disqualify...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add MGX (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
30.5¢ |
Change
0.010(3.39%) |
Mkt cap ! $365.5M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
29.5¢ | 30.5¢ | 29.5¢ | $42.02K | 139.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 104867 | 30.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
30.5¢ | 355340 | 6 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 37120 | 0.920 |
3 | 45770 | 0.915 |
3 | 31253 | 0.910 |
3 | 68342 | 0.905 |
2 | 44392 | 0.900 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.925 | 15328 | 2 |
0.930 | 89494 | 6 |
0.935 | 70442 | 3 |
0.940 | 72592 | 7 |
0.945 | 128342 | 5 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 29/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
MGX (ASX) Chart |