It certainly raises a very interesting point. Should directors...

It certainly raises a very interesting point. Should directors disclose, when it will 'show their hand' and allow potential losses otherwise?

A bit awkward for UGL when their US JV stakeholder CH2M Hill WAS disclosing their write downs simultaneously and on time. At least so it seems.
"Would they just shut-up!" Must have been the board's frustration.

So knowing that CH2M Hill was disclosing, they clearly 'took a chance'.

Would the DTZ profit compare, against the losses?

(Yep I see the Cap-Dividend went ex-dividend on the 18 Nov 2014 )

So smaller potatoes, yet more... :0( A single arguable dollar per share?

-