news from puc, page-8

Ausheds

I gave you a TU for your last post because you deserve it for agreeing with me. LOL!

I think you meant thousands not millions in the previous post to your last post but I only state that for accuracy, not that I want to harass you. I think it was a reasonable inadvertant error in the circumstances.

I did note that as you predicted, potential takeoff partners were impressed by the broad suite or 'spectrum' of REO at Charlie Creek. Also, the possibility of a long term supply from the resource.

(http://imagesignal.comsec.com.au/docserver/01458283.pdf?fileid=01458283&datedir=20131028&edt=MjAxMy0xMC0yOSswOTo1NzozMysxMjArMCtjb21zZWMrcmVkaXJlY3QrL2ltYWdlc2lnbmFsL2Vycm9ycGFnZXMvUERGVGltZW91dC5odG1sKy9pbWFnZXNpZ25hbC9lcnJvcnBhZ2VzL3BkZmRlbGF5ZWQuanNw) Page3

I think that if $15/kilo TREO can be achieved with $160 capital expenditure and possibly 2,000 years of resource this is a very interesting story.

I am looking forward to the new drilling results and an indication of the value of the by-products of the TREO.

Make sure the contents of that draw remain safe.

Cheers

Stoops