In that article it talks about 22mil for restoration. Has that been brought up before?? Or has the counciler had inside info from the courts on the outcome and let some of the requirements slip indicating that the court will back BTU buts needs to commit this amount to conservation??
In that article it talks about 22mil for restoration. Has that...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 34 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
