Refracktion,   You will have to explain to everyone here the...

Refracktion,   You will have to explain to everyone here the bearing of Mr. Egan's words on the relationship between well pressure levels and seismic response.  You'll also have to explain the mechanism by which his words are able to impact this relationship.   It is that correlation as well as the variability/deviations and timing recorded which tell the story regarding Cuadrilla's ability to control and influence seismic response.  Unless you have those numbers, you have no proof that Cuadrilla cannot control seismic response.  

 Those who are not obtuse will recognize that Egan's words likely meant that he didn't think there would be a felt earthquake from the operation (I haven't seen the quote).  Anyone in the field knows that in each of the 2 million plus wells fracked around the world, there has been microseismic events.  You cannot frack a well without them.  Cuadrilla caused 40,000 such events running just two stages.  So, he wasn't claiming that there wouldn't be any seismicity, but that there wouldn't be any seismic events over the microseismic threshold of 2.0, as those earthquakes are typically not felt.  You need to have a certain level of intelligence and common sense to understand the distinction.   

Just as when you tried to represent that A <= A +B when B was a positive value (ie when you told the tale of how lancashire shale would generate as many ghg emissions as imported gas from Qatar) people are not going to fall for your fairy tales.  Get your story together, Refracktion.